Sean Craig
3 min read
In This Article:
The European Union’s executive arm is holding off on implementing new banking rules that could be tantamount to putting a potato sack around the legs of the region’s lenders in the middle of a 100-yard dash against their US counterparts.
The European Commission announced Thursday that the so-called Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, a boring technocratic name if there ever was one, will be delayed one year until 2027. It would place stricter rules on the region’s investment-bank trading desks at a time when the US seems increasingly less inclined to impose similar regulations of its own.
READ ALSO: Just How Much Data Does the Fed Need to Cut Rates? and Retail Investors Risk Ominous Opportunity Cost With Private Investments, Moody’s Warns
The new rules are part of the Basel III international banking reforms that were introduced in 2017 and designed in response to the 2008 financial crisis. Basel III is meant to create global standards for the way banks measure risk and enhance their ability to withstand shocks (a.k.a. prevent another systemic implosion worthy of an Oscar-winning Matt Damon-narrated documentary). Specifically, the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book will tighten how banks measure and hold reserves against their capital markets activities, zeroing in on investment banking.
Investment banking, of course, is on an earnings tear on both sides of the Atlantic, with trading desks cashing in on volatile equities even as US tariff policy has curbed M&A activity. JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley reported record revenue from their equity traders in the first quarter, while investment banking fees rose 12% at JPMorgan and 8% at Morgan Stanley. Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest lender, reported its highest quarterly pre-tax profit in 14 years in the first quarter, with its trading unit netting record revenues. Income at France’s largest bank, BNP Paribas, slipped in its latest quarter, but the equities desk was a bright spot with a record result. Were the EU to implement the new rules now, however, the region’s investment banks could look across the Atlantic and see a US administration less inclined to follow suit:
-
Last year, the Federal Reserve softened its proposed Basel III rules after intense lobbying from the banking industry. That was even before the second Trump administration, which promised a deregulation-focused agenda, came into power. Last month, the Financial Times reported that US officials plan to roll back bank capital requirements in the next few months.
-
In January, as Trump entered office, the UK put its own new capital rules on hold until 2027, with the Bank of England stating that it wanted to see what the US does first, in the interest of its own “competitiveness and growth considerations.” The European Commission made a similar case Thursday, noting that “concerns regarding the international level playing field and the impact on EU banks remain high.”
